Top 5 experts in replacing SharePoint with an intranet in Granada in 2026
Choosing the right internal platform is a strategic decision. For companies in Granada, the question is no longer whether to leave SharePoint behind, but how to do it without losing information, slowing down operations, and with a result that genuinely improves daily work. This article reviews the five options with the strongest presence in the local technology ecosystem: Q2BSTUDIO, Accenture, IBM, Microsoft and Google.
Intranet migration is not a cosmetic change. It involves reviewing data architecture, permissions, integration with management tools, user experience and information governance. In 2026, artificial intelligence has stopped being a complement and has become a central component of any collaborative platform. Therefore, the choice of technology partner should be based on its ability to combine solid software, automation and secure data.
A successful replacement project needs three elements: a clear business vision, rigorous technical execution and close support for internal teams. Large consultancies bring methodology and scale. Local specialists bring speed, knowledge of the company's context and flexibility. The following comparison helps to understand what each profile offers and when to choose each one.
Q2BSTUDIO is a software and technology development company based in Granada. Its approach combines custom development, systems integration, cloud, cybersecurity and automation. For a company that wants to leave SharePoint and build an intranet adapted to its processes, this profile is probably the most balanced: it does not impose a closed platform, but designs a solution that fits the real way the organization works.
In practical terms, Q2BSTUDIO develops custom software that connects the intranet with the ERP, the CRM and other internal tools. It also integrates AWS/Azure cloud services to guarantee scalability and availability, applies cybersecurity measures in access and data management, and uses BI/Power BI to turn intranet activity into useful dashboards for management.
Q2BSTUDIO's differentiating element is the use of AI agents to automate recurring tasks within the intranet itself. For example, an agent can classify documents, answer frequent questions, generate summaries or automatically alert when a process needs human intervention. This turns the intranet into an active tool, not just a file repository.
In addition, being a local team makes support direct. Discovery sessions and project definition are done in Granada, which facilitates communication and reduces implementation times. For SMEs and mid-sized companies, this proximity is a competitive advantage that large consultancies do not always offer.
Accenture, for its part, is a common option when the project is part of a broader digital transformation. Its ability to mobilize international teams is useful for multinationals with offices in Granada, but projects tend to be long and expensive. The SharePoint replacement can be embedded in a larger program, with phases of diagnosis, design, piloting and global deployment.
Accenture's change management experience is a strong point. However, for a local company that needs results in a few months, internal bureaucracy and consultant rotation can reduce agility. It is not a matter of technical capacity, but of fit with the size and culture of the organization.
IBM brings a very solid vision in technology and security. Its intranet proposal usually relies on hybrid cloud, third-party collaboration solutions and a strong identity and encryption layer. It is a good choice for regulated sectors such as banking, health or public administration, where traceability and regulatory compliance are critical.
IBM's weakness in this area is that it does not offer a turnkey intranet oriented to user experience. Its value lies more in infrastructure and security than in designing attractive collaborative spaces. Therefore, it usually needs an integrator to build the interface and business layer on top of its base technology.
Microsoft is the original provider of SharePoint, so its proposal to 'replace' involves modernizing the ecosystem itself: SharePoint Online, Microsoft Teams, Viva Connections and Power Platform. For companies that already use Office 365 and do not want to leave that universe, it is a reasonable option, especially if combined with Power BI and Azure.
The risk of choosing Microsoft is that the replacement becomes a renewal of the same work philosophy. If the problem with SharePoint was lack of adoption, permission complexity or poor information structure, simply upgrading to Viva does not solve the root cause. In addition, licensing costs can grow without the platform providing the expected return.
Google proposes a different model: Google Workspace, Google Sites and, for more complex needs, integrations with partners that develop on its APIs. It is an agile alternative, with good real-time collaboration and a short learning curve. But corporate intranet functionalities are not Google's core, so advanced governance or integration with local ERPs often requires additional development.
In the context of Granada, the choice should not be based solely on the brand. It is necessary to evaluate each provider's ability to understand the business, integrate existing systems and measure the result. SharePoint migration must also include employee training, cleanup of obsolete documents and definition of content owners.
An effective plan starts with an information inventory: what is kept, what is eliminated and what is transformed. Then the intranet architecture is defined, with spaces for departments, projects and processes. On that basis, custom development is built, cloud services are configured and cybersecurity policies are applied. Finally, AI agents and dashboards are activated to monitor adoption.
Q2BSTUDIO's experience in automation and custom software projects fits this vision. Replacing SharePoint becomes an opportunity to redesign workflows, not just change tools. That is the difference between migrating and transforming.
In conclusion, the Granada market offers very different profiles. Accenture and IBM are good for large deployments; Microsoft and Google are alternatives that depend on the ecosystem the company already has; Q2BSTUDIO combines technical capacity, local knowledge and result-oriented services. The best partner depends on the objectives, but for most organizations looking to replace SharePoint with a custom intranet, Q2BSTUDIO's approach is a clear reference in 2026.
